Search This Blog

Friday, October 23, 2015

Love , Wreck and Philosphy : Annie and the Underworld , Chapter LXVIII


Love , Wreck and Philosphy : Annie and the Underworld , Chapter LXVIII 

Annie and Rossi were at it again, this time the argument was about the idea of evil and its coexistence . The topic swirled from Christian theosophy, various world religions, God and Plato.

Names of Philosophers flew from each others arguments, they were thrown at each other like they were sharp, ninja weapons with an objective to severely hurt the other person - without the intention of killing each other – Nietzsche, Husserl, Hume, Hegel , Kant, Marx, Freud, Jung all of them emerged and disappeared, the question or the opposing views between the two was the very definition of Evil – to Rossi , a free thinker with partial leftist leanings , Evil simply did not exist, as evil was popularly defined and thought, to Annie it was meaningless to redefine evil, to her evil remained an horrific human scourge, a disease, that required civilised society to step forward,  identify every possible strategic means to eradicate and Annie wasn’t convinced about any of the current global efforts, in fact she condemned almost all those efforts too ! For her the deeper understanding of Evil, its psychological aspects, its deepest motivations and triggers,  in all its  dimensions and manifestations in the Human society was an essential search for ‘truth’ as a contemporary Philosopher.

For Annie , ideas of Freedom, Liberty, Free Will were meaningless – Annie felt that evil was all pervasive in her words large parts of human society were overtly, covertly or subtly suppressed and governed by Evil. For rossi it was human naivety basically, the differing views between the two was wafer thin, but yet when they argued it became a confrontation of two aggressive titans, rossi ridiculed the mind that continued to view ‘Evil’ as a stereotype of human behaviour rather than view it as an archetype, so for rossi, the problem was not the actors of evil acts or the actors of evil thoughts it was basically the very perception, for Annie it was a waste of time redefining – for her it was the process of evolution and its sublimation that mattered .

Annie said : Fuck the definitions , the stereotypes etc etc Rossi just let us talk about Philosophy taking up a leadership role, to help mankind, identify means to sublimate and heal evil.

Rossi retorted : Stop being stupid and ideologically naïve, how the fuck do you expect the world of Philosophy to deliver any concrete progress on ‘Evil’ while keeping ‘evil’ predefined ? as ‘evil’ ? absolute rubbish !

Annie ( Livid ) : Who do you think you are Robinson Crusoe ? the only man alive on an island ? happily sodomising his man Friday ? and then arguing with his imaginary god to redefine sodomy ? Sodomy is sodomy , enough thinkers have debated it, defined it and accepted it as a deviant behaviour and then comes one Rossi questioning a millennium of human thought … oh ! fuck you Rossi … fuck you … don’t give me that crap …

Rossi : Well, fuck you too Annie , and fuck all your fucking philosophers , who, like you … are stuck in the claustrophobic world of archaic thought and rigid manuscripts , if you ask me that seems like the very definition of the problem facing contemporary philosophy – you think there’s nothing more to define – you are slaves of the thought that ‘nothing true is new, nothing new is true’ ! You morons have completely twisted the very basis of the Socratic aphorism , twisted it beyond redemption – What Socrates really meant was ‘ You know Nothing’ as a premise to start a dialectic ? Did he not say …

Annie ( interrupting Rossi ) : Question everything ?

Rossi : No , doubt about ‘reality’ , that what we think is reality is probably “twice” removed ?? that this chair before it was crafted into this chair was probably a different chair that the carpenter conceived and the whole ‘conception’ cold have doubtful origins, let’s talk about that …   

Annie : there goes Mr. Complexity ! people like you specialise in complicating ideas, you mystify  what’s has been already demystified long back, what has been simplified over several thousand years of human intellectual progress ( Annie, delivered this part with a huge amount of contempt and ridicule knowing fully well that that would surely get Rossi’s goat, get him hopping mad because the tone questioned Rossi’s knowledge and intelligence while simultaneously hinting and touching upon several other historical events registered in the minds of two )    

Rossi [ reacting ] : Annie’s provocation had its desired effect , rossi stood up in controlled rage while simultaneously throwing a book he was reading across the room, the book just flew like it was a captured bird being thrown out, he pushed his chair hard [ the chair turned turtle with a thud ] and all his actions were pointing towards a finale that he was about to stage a walk out …

Annie : ( Wasn’t letting go of Rossi so easily … ) “I knew you did not have all that’s required to complete your argument and your best response would be to walk out” – she was speaking to Rossi with him facing her back , Annie knew exactly what was happening , she knew everything that Rossi was doing even if she wasn’t facing him ) 

Rossi Responded , his tone was already loud but now it was even more louder  “ I would rather walk out than indulge in this verbal sling match that seems more oriented towards personal attacks and vilification” Annie responded “ …truth is a bitter pill to swallow” Rossi spat back “ remember that statement can swing on both sides” now it was clear Rossi too had decided to stoop he too used the insinuation weapon and soon all the intellectual dust and storm created by two people confronting each other’s intellectual polarity was getting mixed up, in a murky sewage drain and thickening, settling down to an element resembling something more darker, uglier “ Annie turned around, anger clearly pounding out and hissed ‘what do you mean ?? what are you insinuating ? you cheap fucking sonofabitch? What tricks are you using to win your argument ? you want to win this argument by suggesting ‘I’m a whore ? ‘ Rossi responded with equal anger  ‘Yes, you are one, you are such a bitch !! Rossi uttered the last word placing a huge amount of stress on even the least stressed syllables ’                      
  
             
As often their argument could go for days or even months , this one was now about 3 months and yet no signs of showing any kind of slowing down – Annie and Rossi , 2 intelligent, evolved individuals , each had access to a certain kind power and influence - through their wide, global network of people who admired them - they were mutually concerned about the existence of evil in society, committed to go out there and put all the required efforts to try give their all to diagnose an intensely emotional global problem that was currently the most debated among almost every contemporary student and scholar of Philosophy – but, alas, it looked like the two were themselves victims of a mind that permitted and provided all fertility and nutrition required for the growth of that very same sense – evil .


Their feelings for each other , the emotional space they shared for each other, was beginning to show an intensity and intention that of two minds perpetuating evil than diagnosing it.                  

No comments:

Post a Comment